META AI UNDER JUDICIAL SCRUTINY : FRENCH PUBLISHERS AND AUTHORS SUE META AI FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGMENT (12.03.2025)

Authored by Mr. Abhishek (A student of Symbiosis Law School, Noida)

 Leading publishers’ and Authors’ associations of France have initiated legal action against U.S. technology giant Meta (META.O) for alleged large-scale copyright violations. The lawsuit is filed in Paris court earlier this week, claiming that Meta has allegedly used copyrighted content without authorization to train its artificial intelligence (AI) systems. 

Allegations of Unauthorized Use of Copyrighted Content Against META 

Three prominent French organizations representing the interests of publishers and authors, namely,   the National Publishing Union (SNE), the National Union of Authors and Composers (SNAC), and the Society of Men of Letters (SGDL) have alleged that Meta has engaged in copyright infringement and economic “parasitism.” These organizations claim that META has used copyrighted material to train its AI models without obtaining the necessary permissions. At a press conference held on Wednesday, representatives from the three associations voiced their concerns regarding what they perceive as a “blatant violation of intellectual property rights.”

“We are witnessing monumental looting,” declared Maia Bensimon, general delegate of SNAC.

SNE Director General Renaud Lefebvre emphasized the magnitude of the case, comparing it to the biblical story of David and Goliath. “It’s a bit of a David versus Goliath battle,” he stated. “It’s a procedure that serves as an example.”

Broader Legal Implications

This case marks the first legal action against an AI company for copyright infringement in France hence making France a part of the broader wave of lawsuits filed worldwide against major technology firms accused of improperly using copyrighted data to develop their AI models.

In the United States, Meta has been targeted by multiple lawsuits from authors and copyright holders. Notably, in 2023, American actress and author Sarah Silverman, along with other writers, filed a lawsuit against Meta, alleging that their books were misused in training its large language model, Llama. The legal action argues that Meta failed to seek permission or compensate the authors for the use of their work.

A similar lawsuit was filed in October 2024 by American novelist Christopher Farnsworth, further intensifying scrutiny on Meta’s data usage practices.

Beyond Meta, other AI industry leaders face similar legal challenges. OpenAI, the company behind the widely used AI tool ChatGPT, is currently battling multiple lawsuits in the United States, Canada, and India. These cases similarly revolve around allegations of unauthorized use of copyrighted content to train AI models.

Meta’s Response and Industry Reactions

As of now, Meta has not issued an official response to the lawsuit filed in France. When approached for comments, representatives for the company did not immediately reply.

The growing number of lawsuits highlights a pressing issue in the AI industry: the ethical and legal implications of using vast amounts of online content for AI training. Content creators, authors, and artists worldwide are raising concerns about fair compensation and intellectual property rights in an era where AI technologies are advancing rapidly.

Legal experts suggest that the outcome of this case could set a precedent for future AI-related copyright disputes in Europe and beyond. The French lawsuit is particularly significant given the European Union’s strong regulatory stance on digital rights and data protection.

The Future of AI and Copyright Law

The legal confrontation between French publishers and Meta underscores the increasing tensions between technology companies and content creators. As AI models continue to evolve, the debate over data usage, intellectual property rights, and fair compensation is expected to intensify.

The case also raises questions about how AI firms acquire and use data, and whether existing copyright laws are sufficient to address the challenges posed by generative AI. With multiple lawsuits already underway in various jurisdictions, regulators may be prompted to introduce clearer guidelines to balance technological innovation with the rights of content creators.

For now, the publishing and authors’ associations in France remain firm in their pursuit of justice. Their lawsuit against Meta is not just a fight for their own industry but a broader call for accountability in the AI sector. As the legal proceedings unfold, the global technology community will be watching closely to see how courts navigate the complex intersection of AI, copyright law, and creative rights.

REFERENCES