THE BREWING BOND OF CHINA AND FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY

Author: Ms. Samiksha Aggarwal

Introduction:

What’s in a face? Maybe everything, or perhaps nothing at all. Why is the face sometimes seen merely at face value and at other times as the whole worth of a person? Can you read a person solely by their face, or do you read a person because their face intrigues you?

The face carries a unique value, one that depends on an individual’s perspective, a perspective deeply rooted in the face culture of one of the world’s most populous countries: China.

In China, the face is an abstract concept. It signifies social standing, influence, dignity, honor, and reputation. While we recognize the dynamic nature of our technologically advanced world, there’s one crucial aspect: technology should liberate, not cage.

Yet, in China, facial recognition technology is omnipresent, monitoring people’s every move in public spaces. It feels like someone is perpetually watching, whether you’re crossing a road or relaxing with friends at a café. This constant scrutiny robs people of their natural selves, a basic human right that should be upheld universally.

How does it feel to be under 24/7 surveillance in the 21st century, an era where progress knows no bounds in various fields?

Un-Abling the balance between technology advancement and Human rights

China’s extensive use of facial recognition technology raises fundamental questions about the balance between security measures and individual rights. One of the primary arguments supporting this system is the necessity for public surveillance. The sheer size of China’s population makes crowd management and public security paramount. However, the ethical question persists: to what extent is constant surveillance justifiable?

Social Credit System: Balancing Behavior and Opportunity

The implementation of a social credit system, where individuals are rewarded for good behavior and penalized for infractions, heavily relies on facial recognition technology. While the intention might be to encourage responsible conduct, it prompts a deeper inquiry: are the citizens of China truly free to express themselves as human beings, or are their actions dictated by the fear of consequences based on surveillance scores?

Border Control and Immigration: Enhancing Security or Infringing Rights?

Facial recognition expedites border crossings and immigration processes, undoubtedly enhancing security. Yet, the critical question lingers: at what point does this technological advancement infringe upon an individual’s right to privacy and freedom of movement?

Transportation Systems: Balancing Safety and Intrusion

In transportation systems, facial recognition is employed for security monitoring, detecting traffic violations, issuing fines, and ensuring overall safety. However, the ethics of this application are ambiguous. Where is the line drawn between ensuring public safety and intruding into the personal lives of citizens?

These questions underscore the ethical dilemmas posed by the widespread use of facial recognition technology in China. While the intent behind its implementation might be rooted in security and efficiency, the extent to which it encroaches upon the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals remains a contentious issue. Striking a balance between technological advancements and preserving human rights is a challenge that demands careful consideration and ethical reflection.

Concerns surrounding the obnoxious technology: A door to reality

Privacy Erosion: Facial recognition technology in China has led to a widespread erosion of privacy. The country has an extensive network of surveillance cameras; in 2019, there were approximately 350 million surveillance cameras in China, and this number has likely increased since then. These cameras constantly capture citizens’ activities, both in public and private spaces, infringing upon their privacy rights.
Emergence of a Surveillance State: China’s widespread use of facial recognition has effectively transformed it into a surveillance state. The government’s efforts to create a nationwide surveillance system, called the Skynet Project, demonstrate the extent of its monitoring capabilities. By 2020, China had over 20 million cameras equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) and facial recognition technology, facilitating comprehensive citizen tracking.
Misidentification Challenges: Despite advancements, facial recognition technology is not infallible. A study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that different facial recognition algorithms have varying accuracy rates. In real-world scenarios, misidentifications occur, leading to innocent individuals facing legal consequences. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) reported an Amazon facial recognition system misidentified 28 members of Congress as criminals, raising concerns about the technology’s reliability.
Bias and Discrimination: Research studies have highlighted biases in facial recognition algorithms, particularly against people with darker skin tones. A study by the Gender Shades project found that commercial gender classification systems had higher error rates for darker-skinned and female faces. In China, this bias translates into discrimination against minority groups, exacerbating social inequalities.
Chilling Effects on Freedom: The omnipresence of facial recognition technology creates a climate of fear and self-censorship. The Uighur minority in Xinjiang, for instance, faces constant surveillance, leading to a chilling effect where individuals limit their expressions to avoid repercussions.
Security Vulnerabilities: Storing facial data in centralized databases poses significant security risks. In 2019, a database containing 2.4 million records from a Chinese-based facial recognition database was left exposed on the internet, highlighting the vulnerability of such systems
Lack of Transparency: The algorithms behind facial recognition systems are often proprietary and lack transparency. This opacity raises concerns about fairness, accountability, and the potential for misuse. The lack of clear regulations or standards exacerbates these worries booking institution.
Absence of Consent: Chinese citizens lack the ability to opt out of facial recognition systems. This lack of consent infringes upon their fundamental right to control their biometric data. The absence of regulatory frameworks amplifies this powerlessness, leaving individuals at the mercy of pervasive surveillance.

These concerns underscore the pressing need for international dialogues on ethical standards and regulations to ensure the responsible use of facial recognition technology and safeguard individual rights.

Conclusion:

In this rapidly advancing technological era, humanity should be liberated, not confined. The analogy of a caged bird perfectly encapsulates the predicament faced by individuals under constant surveillance. The question remains: what purpose does life serve if lived within such constraints? It’s imperative to break free from these shackles and soar high, embracing technology to enhance lives, fostering a future where freedom and innovation coexist harmoniously.

References-